Engleman

(HC) Petersen v. Engleman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20201:20-cv-00311California867 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 KYLE EVAN PETERSEN, No. 1:20-cv-00311-NONE-SKO (HC) 11 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

MOTION TO CONSTRUE, DISMISSING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS AND DECLINING TO ISSUE

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

J. ENGLEMAN, Acting Warden, (Doc. Nos. 5 & 6)

15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Kyle Peterson is a federal prisoner1 proceeding in propria persona with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which he challenges his 2007 conviction in state court for possession of child pornography. On March 9, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition to be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. 5.) The findings and recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of that order. On March 16, 2020, petitioner filed a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.