(HC)Moore

(HC)Moore v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20202:19-cv-01131California3,764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUIS DOMINIQUE MOORE, No. 2:19-cv-1131 MCE KJN P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STU SHERMAN, Respondents. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas 1corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 27, 2020, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action because it was filed beyond the one-year statute of limitations. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Petitioner did not timely oppose the motion. Following multiple extensions of time, petitioner filed an opposition on August 10, 2020. Respondent did not file a reply. I. Chronology Petitioner was convicted on January 6, 2012, of three counts of robbery, two counts of assault with a firearm, one count of attempted murder, one count of burglary, and one count of false imprisonment, stemming from three separate incidents. (ECF No. 18-1.) In addition, the jury found true various gun use enhancements, along with other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.