Garcha

Garcha v. City of Stockton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20202:19-cv-01547California2,382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANRAJ S. GARCHA, No. 2:19-cv-01547-KJM-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., Defendants.

17 In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case making Fourth Amendment and related claims arising out of plaintiff’s arrest, defendants move for summary judgment based on plaintiff’s failure to timely respond to defendant’s Requests for Admission and the resulting admissions that are fatal to plaintiff’s case. For the following reasons, the court GRANTS defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND On January 2, 2018, plaintiff filed a complaint in state court alleging the following claims: (1) violation of § 1983 and the Fourth Amendment against the individual defendants based on officers’ “warrantless, forcible entry into Plaintiff’s home and the seizure of Plaintiff”; (2) violation of § 1983 against the City of Stockton based on a failure to train with respect to the use of bean bag shots; (3) violation of California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.