Spearman

(HC) Thompson v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20202:19-cv-02328California275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KANE MICHAEL THOMPSON, No. 2:19-cv-2328 KJM DB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS M.E. SPEARMAN, WARDEN Respondent. 16 By order issued April 2, 2020, petitioner’s request for a sixty-two-day extension of time to file a first amended petition was denied. (ECF No. 16). Instead, petitioner was given thirty days leave to file an amended application. (See id. at 2). The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.