Borges
(PC) Burghardt v. Borges
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARRYL BURGHARDT, 1:17-cv-01433-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE SECOND
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT NOT EXCEEDING
PAGES, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
L. BORGES, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Darryl Burghardt (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On August 20, 2020, the court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Borges, Renteria, Montoya, Osuma, Gomez, and Gonzales from this action for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend; and dismissing all other claims from this action as unrelated claims under Rule 18(a), without prejudice to filing new cases to bring those claims. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff shall be granted thirty days in which to file the Second Amended Complaint curing the deficiencies in his claims identified in the findings…