Yellowcake, Inc. v. Hyphy Music, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20201:20-cv-00988California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YELLOWCAKE, INC., a California No. 1:20-cv-00988-DAD-BAM corporation, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SETH L. Plaintiff, BERMAN’S PRO HAC VICE STATUS SHOULD

NOT BE DENIED

v.

HYPHY MUSIC, INC.,

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

Plaintiff Yellowcake, Inc. initiated this copyright action on July 16, 2020. (Doc. No. 1.) On August 20, 2020, Seth L. Berman filed an application to appear and participate pro hac vice in this action. (Doc. No. 10.) Local Rule 180 governs the admission of attorneys to practice pro hac vice in this Court. Pursuant to Local Rule 180(b)(2),

Unless authorized by the Constitution of the United States or an Act of Congress, an attorney is not eligible to practice [pro hac vice] if any one or more of the following apply: (i) the attorney resides in California, (ii) the attorney is regularly employed in California, or (iii) the attorney is regularly engaged in professional activities in California. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.