(HC) Dynes v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20201:20-cv-01149California1,418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN RAY DYNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-01149-JDP Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS PETITION AS SECOND OR

v. SUCCESSIVE KEN CLARK, OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS Respondent. ECF No. 1 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE

17 Petitioner John Ray Dynes, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The matter is before the court for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the judge assigned to a habeas corpus proceeding must examine the petition and order a response thereto unless it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019); Boyd v. Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 1998). Rule 4 was “designed to give courts an active role in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.