Spearman

(HC) Thompson v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20202:20-cv-00726California316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KANE MICHAEL THOMPSON, No. 2:20-cv-0726 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

M.E. SPEARMAN, Respondent. 16 By an order issued April 13, 2020, petitioner was directed to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 3). At that time, he was warned that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (See ECF No. 3 at 1). The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner has neither paid the filing fee nor filed an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.