(PC) Rojas Barriga v. Superior Court of California County of San Luis Obispo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20201:20-cv-00135California706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE A. ROJAS BARRIGA, No. 1:20-cv-00135-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ACTION COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO and SULLIVAN, Warden at CCI, (Doc. No. 16) Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Jose A. Rojas Barriga is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 24, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) and issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the SAC be dismissed without further leave to amend. (Doc. No. 16.) While the magistrate judge found the SAC “difficult to understand,” the magistrate judge concluded that “[m]ost, if not all, of Plaintiff’s [claims] appear[] to be directed at challenging his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.