Sherman

(PC) Johnson v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20201:19-cv-00984California252 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

WwOAOUW 41.497 VV VUIOT YAW MVVULTICII 2£O Vvorewcy Paye +vrst

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA > || REGINALD JOHNSON, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00984-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO V. ) CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO

REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

STUART SHERMAN, et al., ) PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. ) (ECF Nos. 25, 27) ) Plaintiff Reginald Johnson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. N95 .) On August 24, 2020, Defendants filed a stipulation concurring in Plaintiff's request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.