Sherman

(PC) Hamilton v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20201:19-cv-01010California256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

wOoOe 4: EY EU YEADON Oe eT AY Ot

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 EDDIE HAMILTON, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01010-SAB (PC) ° Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO v. ) REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL ) PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL STUART SHERMAN, et al., ) RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF Nos. 27, 29)

11 Plaintiff Eddie Hamilton is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 13 |] pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule ot 15 || Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)Gi). (ECF No. 25.) On August 24, 2020, Defendants filed a stipulation 16 || concurring in Plaintiff's request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.