(PS) Conerly v. Veracity Research Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARINA CONERLY, et al., No. 2:19-cv-1021-KJM-KJN Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT

v. (ECF No. 28) VERACITY RESEARCH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Carina Conerly, M.T., James Conerly, and Marilyn Tillman-Conerly, proceeding pro se, assert claims against defendants Veracity Research Company and one of its employees, Kristy Torain. (ECF No. 12.) Presently pending before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment against defendant Veracity Research. (ECF No. 28.) The undersigned recommends the motion for default judgment be DENIED. Further, upon reviewing the operative complaint, pursuant to the court’s independent duty to assess federal subject matter jurisdiction, the undersigned recommends certain portions of plaintiffs’ second amended complaint be DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. /// /// 27 1 This motion is referred to the undersigned by Local Rule…