Hicks

(PC) Ardds v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20201:19-cv-01738California2,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTOINE L. ARDDS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01738-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

D. HICKS, et.al., ) ORDER BE DENIED ) Defendants. ) [ECF No. 33] ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s fourth motion for a temporary restraining order, filed August 24, 2020. Plaintiff seeks a court order directing prison officials to provide his legal property and materials in order to litigate his current cases. I. DISCUSSION The purpose of a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status quo if the balance of equities so…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.