(SS)Wells

(SS)Wells v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20202:18-cv-03046California2,188 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVIN WELLS, No. 2:18–cv–03046–KJN

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. (ECF No. 22)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Presently pending before the court is counsel for plaintiff Young Cho’s motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), filed on July 21, 2020. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff’s counsel seeks an award of $23,000. On August 12, 2020, the Commissioner filed an advisory response to plaintiff’s counsel’s motion. (ECF No. 20.) On August 20, 2020, plaintiff’s counsel filed a reply in support of the motion for attorneys’ fees. (ECF No. 21.) The court grants the motion for attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). /// /// ///

1 This case was initially referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(15), and both parties voluntarily consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF Nos. 5, 7, 8.) BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.