Winkfield

(PC) Belmonte v. Winkfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20202:19-cv-01189California753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL BELMONTE, No. 2:19-cv-1189 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WINKFIELD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner1 proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has filed what the court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction. See ECF No. 18 at 4. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that the motion be denied. I. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION On January 15, 2020, plaintiff filed a supplement to his second amended complaint with the court. ECF No. 18. In the supplement, he attaches a document labeled “Order to Show Cause for a Preliminary Injunction.” See ECF No. 18 at 4. It effectively requests that unspecified 27 The court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.