Annin
(PC) DeBose v. Annin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DWIGHT M. DEBOSE, No. 2:20-cv-0108 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
J. WEISS, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 4, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed because plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiff filed a response. As discussed below, the undersigned finds that plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed because it is barred by the statute of limitations. II. Plaintiff’s Complaint Plaintiff claims that on May 7, 2014, he was placed in administrative segregation (“ad seg”) based on staff’s claim that they found a note plaintiff had written stating he was planning to assault staff on Facility A at High Desert State Prison, despite plaintiff having had shoulder…