(PC) Dearwester v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20202:19-cv-00124California300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK LEE DEARWESTER, No. 2:19-cv-0124 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On July 9, 2020, plaintiff was granted until August 15, 2020 to file a response to defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a timely response would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has not filed a response. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.