Freas

(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Freas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20202:20-cv-00352California340 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:20-cv-00352-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER EDDIE FREAS et al., Defendants. 16 On July 23, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 11.) On August 10, 2020, Plaintiff filed objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 13.) The Court has considered Plaintiff’s objections. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.