C.G.

C.G. v. Redding Christian School

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20202:19-cv-00348California735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 C.G. (a minor), by and through his No. 2:19-cv-00348-MCE-DMC Parents and Guardians ad Litem, DONALD and WENDY GRAHAM, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. REDDING CHRISTIAN SCHOOL and DOES 1-30, inclusive, 16 Defendant.

18 Through the present action, minor Plaintiff C.G. (“C.G”), by and through his 19 Parents and Guardians ad Litem, Donald Graham and Wendy Graham, (“Plaintiffs”) 20 sought relief from Defendant Redding Christian School (“Redding Christian” or 21 “Defendant”) for allegedly discriminating against Plaintiff when he was expelled due to 22 misbehavior allegedly related to his Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (“ADHD”). 23 Federal jurisdiction was premised solely on Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 24 1973, which prohibits discrimination against the disabled by any program or activity 25 receiving federal funding. 29 U.S.C.A. § 794.1 26 1 In addition to their federal claim under the Rehabilitation Act, Plaintiffs’ Complaint also includes 27 three causes of action sounding solely in state law: two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.