Davis

Davis v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20202:20-cv-00799California2,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WENDI-MAE DAVIS, No. 2:20-cv-00799-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER FCA US LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 In this case involving plaintiff’s allegedly defective vehicle, plaintiff moves to remand on the basis that defendants have failed to show removal was proper. For the reasons below, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND On or around September 26, 2015, plaintiff Wendi-Mae Davis (“plaintiff”) purchased the vehicle in question, a 2015 Chrysler 300, from defendant FCA U.S. LLC (“FCA”). Notice of Removal Ex. A, ECF No. 1 at 15 (plaintiff’s state court complaint). Plaintiff claims she received express written and implied warranties from FCA as part of her purchase, including a warranty that if a defect developed with the vehicle during the warranty period, defendants’ representative would repair the vehicle. Id. at 15. Plaintiff alleges these problems, of which FCA was aware and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.