Wilson

Wilson v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20202:20-cv-00720California2,103 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 PATRICK LEE WILSON and CASEY No. 2:20-cv-00720-JAM-EFB

LEIGH WILSON,

10 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ v. MOTION TO REMAND

FCA US, LLC; CHRYSLER DODGE

JEEP RAM; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive 14 Defendants. 15 This matter is before the Court on Patrick and Casey Wilson’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand. Mot. to Remand (“Mot.”), ECF No. 9. FCA US, LLC and Sacramento Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram (collectively “Defendants”) filed an opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion, Opp’n, ECF No. 12, to which Plaintiffs replied, Reply, ECF No. 13. After consideration of the parties’ briefing on the motion and relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand.1 I. BACKGROUND On January 16, 2017, Plaintiffs bought a 2017 Chrysler

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for July 28, 2020. Pacifica. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.