Petersen

(PC) Miles v. Petersen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20202:20-cv-00807California882 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGIA MILES, No. 2:20-cv-0807 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER PATRICE PETERSEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former Plumas County jail inmate, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 15, 2020, plaintiff moved to recuse the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144. (ECF No. 16). As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion is denied. I. Legal Standards Federal law provides that a party may seek recusal of a judge based on bias or prejudice. Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.