(PS) Lynn v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20202:19-cv-01317California1,928 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LORI D. LYNN, No. 2:19-cv-1317-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY JUVENILE

DEPENDENCY COURT, CAROL

CHRISMAN, TAMERA ZEACHA,

SHERRI HELLER, ABBY RIOS,

16 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Her 19 declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. 20 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 21 Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required 22 inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the 23 allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on 24 which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. As discussed 25 below, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim and must be dismissed. 26 27 This case, in which plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.