(PS) Ward v. Department of Child Protective Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20202:19-cv-00652California2,475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL N. WARD, No. 2:19-cv-652-MCE-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DEPARTMENT OF CHILD

PROTECTIVE SERVICES, MEGAN

DANIELS, MARINA CHAMBERS, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. His declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. As discussed below, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim and must be dismissed. ///// 27 This case, in which plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.