Loadholt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY L. PATTON, No. 2: 19-cv-0451 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F.N.P. LOADHOLT, et al., Defendants. 16 Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel further responses to interrogatories from defendants Dhillon, Rading, Aguilera, Haile, Loadholt, Moon and Kelso. (ECF No. 58.) On August 13, 2020, the undersigned recommended that defendant Kelso’s motion to dismiss be granted on the grounds that defendant Kelso is entitled to quasi-judicial immunity. (ECF No. 66.) Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to compel addressed to defendant Kelso is denied based on the pending findings and recommendations recommending that defendant Kelso’s motion to dismiss be granted. //// //// Legal Standard The scope of discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) is…