Prince

Prince v. County of Plumas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20202:20-cv-00862California1,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo----

LEWIS CARL PRINCE and ESTHER NO. 2:20-cv-00862 WBS EFB PRINCE, husband and wife, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 THE COUNTY OF PLUMAS, a political subdivision of the State of California, PLUMAS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, a public entity of the County of Plumas, GREG HAGWOOD, former Plumas County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, BJORN JAMES BERG, in his individual and official capacities, DOES I-XV, inclusive, BLACK &

WHITE CORPORATIONS I-V; ABLE

& BAKER PUBLIC ENTITIES I-V, Defendants. 24 ----oo0oo---- STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for August 31, 2020, and makes the following findings and orders without needing to consult with the parties any further. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All non-fictitious defendants have been served, and no further service is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.