Parker

(PC) Bettencourt v. Parker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20201:16-cv-00150California618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GARY RAY BETTENCOURT, Case No. 1:16-cv-00150-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COPIES v. (ECF No. 53) PARKER, et al., Defendants. 14 Plaintiff Gary Ray Bettencourt (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims of deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendant Crooks for pulling two teeth that did not need to be pulled, and against Defendants Parker and Guzman for filing down six healthy teeth with a dental tool used for drilling cavities. Defendants have returned executed waivers of service, and their answers or other responsive pleadings to the complaint are due on or before September 7, 2020. (ECF Nos. 50–52.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, filed August 28, 2020, where he appears to be seeking copies of all pleadings filed by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.