Biter

(PC) Asberry v. Biter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20201:16-cv-01741California1,660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONY ASBERRY, Case No. 1:16-cv-01741-NONE-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR

v. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE DENIED C. RELEVANTE, et al., ECF Nos. 180, 184 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 16 Plaintiff Tony Asberry is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief against defendants and others. ECF Nos. 180, 184. For the reasons discussed below, the court recommends denying plaintiff’s motions. Discussion A federal district court may issue injunctive relief only if the court has both personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. See Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350 (1999) (noting that one “becomes a party officially, and is required to take action in that capacity, only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.