(SS) Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20202:18-cv-02415California355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERESA DIANE DAVIS, No. 2:18-cv-2415-WBS-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 28, 30.) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 On August 10, 2020 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 30), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On August 24, 2020 plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and on August 31, 2020, the Commissioner filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 31, 32.) This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court assumes its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.