(PS) Murphy v. Colony Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20202:20-cv-00303California1,239 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNON O. MURPHY ESQ. SR., DBA No. 2:20-CV-00303-JAM-CKD

SHEETMETAL & ASSOCIATES,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS

CONOLY INSURANCE COMPANY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is pro se and proceeding in this action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This action was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 18, 2020, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend, and provided plaintiffs with 30 days to file a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was advised that failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) The deadline to file an amended complaint passed, and plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint as ordered. Plaintiff likewise did not file a notice of voluntary dismissal. Accordingly, the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.