Alegria

(PS) Peacemaker v. Alegria

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20202:20-cv-00118California1,252 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHIRLY A. PEACEMAKER, et al., No. 2:20-CV-00118-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SARA ALEGRIA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs are pro se and proceeding in this action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This action was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 5, 2020, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint with leave to amend, and provided plaintiffs with 30 days to file a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 5.) On February 28, 2020, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) On July 10, 2020, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ first amended complaint with leave to amend and provided plaintiff with thirty days to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiffs were cautioned that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.