USCIS
(PS) Singh v. USCIS
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VEER B SINGH, No. 2:18-cv-2929 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER USCIS, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICES,
15 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Veer Singh is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is defendant’s January 23, 2020 motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint or for a more definitive statement pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 23.) For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss will be granted and plaintiff will be granted leave to file a second amended complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on November 7, 2018, by filing a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) On January 6, 2020, 28 …