(PC) Randolph v. CSP Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20202:19-cv-01670California1,187 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL RANDOLPH, No. 2:19-cv-01670-JAM-CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CSP SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed March 20, 2020, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed it with leave to amend. ECF No. 7. On April 20, 2020 plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. ECF No. 10. I. Screening Requirement The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court will independently dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.