Naiman

Naiman v. Adjustable Bedding Concepts, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20202:19-cv-00702California3,010 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIDNEY NAIMAN, Plaintiff, No. 2:19-cv-0702 MCE DB v. ADJUSTABLE BEDDING CONCEPTS, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INC., D/B/A/ EASY REST,

15 Defendant. 17 This matter came before the undersigned on December 6, 2019, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19), for hearing of plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. (ECF No. 12.) Attorney Timothy Sostrin appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. No appearance was made on behalf of the defendant. At that time, oral argument was heard and the motion was taken under submission. Having considered all written materials submitted with respect to the motion, and after hearing oral argument, the undersigned recommends that the motion for default judgment be granted as explained below. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Sidney Naiman initiated this action through counsel on April 25, 2019, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) The complaint alleges that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.