(PS)Crago

(PS)Crago v. Sacramento Sheriff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20202:19-cv-02510California1,231 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY J. CRAGO, No. 2:19-CV-02510-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO SHERRIFF et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is pro se and proceeding in this action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This action was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 6, 2020, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend, and provided plaintiffs with 30 days to file a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was advised that failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) The deadline to file an amended complaint passed, and plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint as ordered. Plaintiff likewise did not file a notice of voluntary dismissal. Accordingly, the court recommends dismissal of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.