(PC) Windham v. State of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES WINDHAM, No. 2:20-cv-0773 TLN DB P Plaintiff, ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court finds plaintiff states no cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff will be given another opportunity to amend his complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is incarcerated at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”). He complains of conduct that occurred there in February and March 2020. On screening plaintiff’s original complaint, this court found plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims for relief. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was given the opportunity to file an amended complaint. On June 30, 2020, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. Before the court had an 27 …