(SS) Jaramillo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20201:17-cv-00064California2,021 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERARDO JARAMILLO, Case No. 1:17-cv-00064-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY

v. FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF No. 27)

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Petitioner Melissa Newel (“Counsel” or “Petitioner”), attorney for Gerardo Jaramillo (“Plaintiff”), filed the instant motion for attorney fees on August 7, 2020. (Mot. Att’y Fees (“Mot.”), ECF No. 27.) Counsel requests fees in the net amount of $25,514.75 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), with an offset of $4,800.00 for fees previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Plaintiff was served with the motion and advised that any opposition to the motion was to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF Nos. 28, 29.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the request. On March 10, 2020, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), filed a statement of non-opposition, specifying the filing was made in a role 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.