(HC) Sisco v. Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20201:20-cv-00947California676 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HALLIS R. SISCO, No. 1:20-cv-00947-DAD-JLT (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF’S PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

DEPARTMENT,

(Doc. No. 11) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Hallis R. Sisco is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2554. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. On July 10, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the petition be dismissed without prejudice due to a lack of jurisdiction. In particular, the assigned magistrate judge found that petitioner failed to name a proper respondent and failed to exhaust his claims by first presenting them to the highest state court prior to seeking federal habeas relief. (Doc. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.