Price

(PC) Dannenberg v. Price

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20201:20-cv-00128California1,281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC DANNENBERG, Case No. 1:20-cv-00128-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION

BRANDON PRICE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY AND

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

16 (ECF No. 10)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

19 Eric Dannenberg (“Plaintiff”), a civil detainee, is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 20, 2020, an order issued requiring Plaintiff to either file an amended complaint or a notice that he was willing to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable in the complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 10.) More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, filed a notice that he wishes to proceed on the cognizable claim, nor otherwise responded to the Court’s order.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.