(PC) Kakowski v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20202:19-cv-00656California2,170 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN KAKOWSKI, No. 2: 19-cv-0656 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s original complaint as to defendants Silva and Deputy Daniele. Plaintiff alleges that while he was housed at the Sacramento County Jail, defendants violated his constitutional rights in various ways from November 2016 through November 2017. Pending before the court is defendant Silva’s motion for reconsideration of the May 8, 2020 order denying defendant Silva’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 25.) For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motion for reconsideration is denied. Standard for a Motion for Reconsideration “A district court’s power to rescind, reconsider, or modify an interlocutory order is derived from the common law, not from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.