Navarro

(PC) Howell v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20201:19-cv-00820California513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAREEM HOWELL, 1:19-cv-00820-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UNDER

vs. RULE 41 (ECF No. 7.) C. NAVARRO, et al.,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

Defendants. CLOSE FILE

16 Kareem Howell (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 13, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 1.) On August 28, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of this case. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has a right to voluntarily dismiss this case under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In Wilson v. City of San Jose, the Ninth Circuit explained:

23 Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary 24 judgment. Concha v. London, 62 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.