Hearn

(PC) Thorpe v. Hearn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20202:19-cv-01974California1,113 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RENELL THORPE, No. 2:19-cv-1974 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C. HEARN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 23, 2020, the undersigned granted plaintiff thirty days to show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for his failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 36.) For the reasons stated herein, the order to show cause is discharged. On March 10, 2020, defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff failed to file an opposition. Accordingly, on April 13, 2020, the undersigned granted plaintiff sixty days to file an opposition. (ECF No. 34.) Sixty days passed and plaintiff did not file an opposition to the motion for partial summary judgment. On June 25, 2020, defendants filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 35.) Defendants argued that plaintiff failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.