Parmar
Johnson v. Parmar
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SCOTT JOHNSON, No. 2:15-cv-256-KJM-EFB Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NARESHKUMAR PARMAR; DAXA PARMAR; and Does 1-10, 14 Defendants.
16 This case is before the court on plaintiff’s ex parte application for entry of stipulated judgment. ECF No. 20. For the reasons stated below, the request for entry of stipulated judgment should be granted. Plaintiff filed this action against defendants Nareshkumar Parmar and Daxa Parmar, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq., the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), the California Disabled Persons Act, and a claim for negligence. ECF No. 1. In October 2015, the parties reached a settlement of the case. ECF No. 15. As part of that settlement, defendants agreed to pay plaintiff $10,000 in 25 monthly installments, with the first $400 payment due November 15, 2015. See ECF No. 20-3 at 2. The ///// 27 The…