(PC) Christopher Lipsey v. Edmund Brown, Jr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20202:18-cv-01997California457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., No. 2:18-cv-1997 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 19, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed a statement of non-opposition, which the court construes as objections. ECF No. 15. In the statement of non-opposition, plaintiff concedes that the complaint should be dismissed without prejudice. See id. However, the statement also asks the court to: (1) state for the record that the dismissal does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.