Toor

(PC) Keene v. Toor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20201:17-cv-01169California437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN SCOTT KEENE, Case No. 1:17-cv-01169-NONE-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

KIRAN TOOR, et al., ECF Nos. 38, 43 Defendants.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS 17 Plaintiff has been given multiple extensions to respond to defendants’ motion for 18 summary judgment, ECF No. 38. Plaintiff’s response was originally due on March 13, 2020. 19 Plaintiff’s most recent extension allowed him to file a response by July 20, 2020. ECF No. 43. 20 Plaintiff was also ordered to seek another extension if he continued to be denied access to the law 21 library. See id. Plaintiff has neither sought further extensions nor responded to defendants’ 22 motion for summary judgment. Thus, the court will order plaintiff to show cause why his case 23 should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.