Kelso

(PC) McCoy v. Kelso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20201:12-cv-00983California1,075 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JOSEPH RAYMOND McCOY, CASE NO. 1:12-CV-0983 AWI SAB (PC)

Plaintiff

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

v. FOR RECONSIDERATION

J. CLARK KELSO, et al., (Doc. No. 192, 238, 239) Defendants

11 12 This is a civil rights lawsuit brought by pro se prisoner Joseph McCoy against personnel employed at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility. Currently pending before the Court are three motions by Plaintiff that request reconsideration of various rulings made by the Magistrate Judge. Legal Standard A district court may refer pretrial issues to a magistrate judge to either hear and decide or issue findings and recommendations. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Khrapunov v. Prosyankin, 931 F.3d 922, 930-31 (9th Cir. 2019); Bhan v.NME Hosp., Inc., 929 F.2d 1404, 1414 (9th Cir. 1991). If a party objects to a non-dispositive pretrial ruling by a magistrate judge, the district court will review or reconsider the ruling under the “clearly erroneous or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.