White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FNU HAMEEDULLAH, No. 2:19-cv-1714-TLN-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER GREG WHITE, BENJAMIN MARQUEZ, and ZAMBI, 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff’s original complaint was dismissed with leave to amend for failure to state a 17 claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). ECF No. 8. He has since filed a first amended 18 complaint. As discussed below, that complaint, too, fails to state a claim and must be dismissed. 19 As previously explained to plaintiff, although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, see 20 Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), a complaint, or portion thereof, should be 21 dismissed for failure to state a claim if it fails to set forth “enough facts to state a claim to relief 22 that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554, 562-563 (2007) 23 (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957)); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). “[A] plaintiff’s 24 obligation to provide the ‘grounds’ of his ‘entitlement to relief’ requires more than…