(PS) Edison v. Los Angeles Police Department

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEWIS EDISON, No. 2:20–cv–1304–KJM–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v. LOS ANGELES POLICE

DEPARTMENT,

15 Defendant. 16 On June 30, 2020, plaintiff filed a complaint and accompanying motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 2). On July 14, the court granted the IFP request, but dismissed all claims with leave to amend because the complaint lacked any facts to support his allegations. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was also ordered to show cause why the action should not be transferred to the Central District of California, as all claims concerned actions taken by officers in the Los Angeles Police Department. (Id.) The court instructed that plaintiff’s amended complaint (or notice of voluntary dismissal) should be filed within 28 days, and warned him that failure to do so could result in dismissal. (Id.) The deadline has now passed, and the court has not received any filings from…