Reilly

(PC) Ruiz v. Reilly

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20202:20-cv-01212California895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:20-cv-1212 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND A. REILLY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) reads as follows: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Court records reflect that on at least three prior occasions,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.