Patel

(PC) Torres v. Patel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20201:18-cv-00188California8,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MIGUEL TORRES., ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00188-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) ISMAIL PATEL, et.al., ) [ECF No. 48] Defendants. ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Miguel Torres is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed June 25, 2020. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Patel, Ulit, Manasrah, Spaeth and Serda, in their individual capacities, for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants filed an answer to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.